Elon Musk’s X sues Minnesota over free speech concerns, says ‘This will inevitably result in…’

X, owned by Elon Musk, has sued Minnesota over its law banning AI-generated deepfakes intended to influence elections, arguing it violates free speech rights. The platform claims the law will censor valuable political commentary and is challenging its validity under the First Amendment and Section 230. This legal action follows a similar challenge already underway by others.
Elon Musk’s X sues Minnesota over free speech concerns, says ‘This will inevitably result in…’
Elon Musk-owned X (formerly Twitter) has reportedly sued Minnesota, challenging a law that prohibits the use of AI-generated deepfakes to influence elections. According to a Reuters report, the social media platform argued that the law is a violation of free speech rights. “This system will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech and commentary,” X said in its complaint. For those unaware, Elon Musk, after the acquisition in 2022, removed Twitter's content moderation policy and renamed the platform to X.

What is Minnesota law that X has filed lawsuit against


Minnesota’s law – that X has filed a lawsuit against – makes it illegal to use deepfakes—AI-generated videos, images, or audio that appear real—to try and influence an election. According to data from Public Citizen, at least 22 other US states have passed similar laws, warning that AI can be used to mislead or manipulate voters.

What X says in lawsuit against Minnesota


In its lawsuit, X has asked the federal judge to declare the law as violating the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Minnesota's constitution, further arguing that it was impermissibly vague. The company also wants the judge to find the law is precluded by what is known as Section 230, a federal law that protects social media companies from being held liable for content posted by users.
Poll
Is the Minnesota law against deepfakes too vague?

X, through the lawsuit, is demanding a permanent injunction preventing the law from being enforced.
Not a first
The Minnesota law is already facing a legal challenge from Republican state lawmaker Mary Franson and social media influencer Christopher Kohls. Earlier in January, U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino denied their request for a preliminary injunction to halt the law’s enforcement. However, her decision did not weigh in on the overall validity of the lawsuit, which is now under appeal.
author
About the Author
TOI Tech Desk

The TOI Tech Desk is a dedicated team of journalists committed to delivering the latest and most relevant news from the world of technology to readers of The Times of India. TOI Tech Desk’s news coverage spans a wide spectrum across gadget launches, gadget reviews, trends, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports and breaking stories that impact technology and the digital universe. Be it how-tos or the latest happenings in AI, cybersecurity, personal gadgets, platforms like WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook and more; TOI Tech Desk brings the news with accuracy and authenticity.

End of Article

Latest Mobiles

Follow Us On Social Media