• News
  • India News
  • Judge 'cash at home' case: CJI sets up 3-member panel, orders in-house inquiry into allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma

Judge 'cash at home' case: CJI sets up 3-member panel, orders in-house inquiry into allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma

Judge 'cash at home' case: CJI sets up 3-member panel, orders in-house inquiry into allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma
A three-member committee has been constituted by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna to conduct an inquiry into allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting Judge of the High Court of Delhi. The committee comprises Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Justice GS Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, and Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka.
Allegations surfaced against Justice Varma after a fire at his official residence led to the alleged discovery of a significant amount of cash. Initial reports put the amount at Rs 15 crore, although this figure has not been officially confirmed.
The Supreme Court's in-house inquiry procedure dictates that when allegations arise against a High Court judge, the Chief Justice of India, after a preliminary inquiry, forms a committee of three judges to investigate the matter after seeking a response from the judge in question.

No judicial work


Significantly, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi for the time being has been asked not to assign any judicial work to Justice Yashwant Varma. The report submitted by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi, response of Justice Yashwant Varma, and other documents, are being uploaded on the Supreme Court website.
Following the alleged discovery of the unaccounted cash, the Supreme Court collegium had convened a meeting and the Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi, D K Upadhyay, was asked to file a report regarding the allegations against Justice Varma. The report was submitted on March 21.
In another decision, which the SC has clarified was not connected to the allegations, Justice Varma was transferred back to his parent court in Allahabad.
The Supreme Court has emphasised that the proposal for Justice Varma's transfer was independent of any ongoing inquiry into the cash allegations.
In February 2018, the Central Bureau of Investigation had named Justice Varma as an accused in the Simbhaoli Sugar Mill fraud case involving a ₹97.85 crore loan misappropriation. Justice Varma was a non-executive director of the company at the time. Although the CBI launched a probe, the case seemingly lost momentum, and a subsequent court order to resume the investigation was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2024, effectively ending the inquiry.
author
About the Author
TOI News Desk

The TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most."

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA